Case Story: Helping an Employee navigate an employer’s “restructuring”

Our client showed up to work one day only to learn her job had been eliminated due to company-wide “restructuring.” Instead of just accepting the status quo, she hired us and we helped maximize her separation severance agreement.

DISCLAIMER:

CASE RESULTS DEPEND ON A VARIETY OF FACTORS UNIQUE TO EACH CASE. CASE RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE OR PREDICT A SIMILAR RESULT IN ANY FUTURE CASE.


A person’s job, especially in America, is one of the defining features of their identity.

We go there every day. We do so for nearly a third of our life. Many of our closest friends—and sometimes even spouses—come from there.

It’s a throughline for all of us.

So what happens when that certainty and stability is all of a sudden gone in the blink of an eye? Without any notice or warning. In one day, out the next.

That’s what this case is about.

Our client, a long-time and well-liked employee, came into work one day only to find out her job had been terminated. “Restructured” was the official nomenclature. Upset and feeling unfairly treated, she contacted us and we worked to help maximize the benefits she received as part of her separation.

It wasn’t as good as keeping her job, of course, but it was much better than just accepting the status quo.

Here’s how we did it.

The Termination

The call came on an ordinary Tuesday morning. Our client, a long-time employee at a local, well-known business, was told that her position was being eliminated due to “restructuring.” She was given no warning. No performance concerns were identified. No prior corrective action existed.

Just a meeting, a packet, and a request for her signature on a separation agreement that waived nearly every legal right she had.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, before she even had time to process the shock, HR ratcheted up the pressure by email: “We’ll need this back by Friday.”

That’s when she contacted us.

She said she wasn’t just worried about losing her job. She was worried about losing her income, her health insurance, and her professional reputation. And the severance offer was small—barely two weeks’ pay—but the release was massive: it covered legal claims of discrimination, retaliation, wage, and even future unknown claims.

She told us she felt concerned. She also said she didn’t want to “cause trouble” and ruin her future employment opportunities.

Usually, this is the moment many employees sign away their leverage. But it’s also the moment where early legal intervention and guidance make the biggest difference.

Luckily, she chose the latter.

Our Involvement

A separation agreement is not just paperwork. It’s a contract. A contract that often asks an employee to give up far more than they realize.

And that’s exactly what we saw here.

Within minutes of reviewing our client’s agreement, several issues stood out:

  • Overbroad release – The employer wanted immunity from nearly every type of legal claim, far beyond what was reasonable for the severance offered.

  • Confidentiality terms – The clause would have prevented our client from discussing workplace concerns with future employers or even her own family.

  • Non-disparagement – The language was one-sided, protecting the employer but not our client.

  • No neutral reference – Without this, our client’s future job prospects could be harmed.

  • Unrealistic deadline – Our client was given only a few days to review and sign the document, despite the agreement referencing legal rights that normally require a longer review period.

These are not small details. They are the difference between a fair transition and a damaging one.

So we met with our client and came to a common understanding of her goals: stability, dignity, and a clean break. She didn’t want litigation. She wanted fairness.

With this in mind, we developed a negotiation plan that focused on

  • Increasing severance to reflect her tenure and the breadth of the release

  • Securing a neutral reference

  • Making non-disparagement mutual

  • Narrowing the release to what was actually necessary

  • Extending her health insurance coverage

  • Ensuring she had adequate time to review and consider the agreement

This wasn’t about aggression. It was about leverage, timing, and professional communication.

The Result

When we contacted the employer on behalf of our client, their tone changed. The rushed deadline disappeared. The severance amount increased. The release was narrowed. Mutual non-disparagement was added. A neutral reference was guaranteed.

This is a good lesson for all employees: our client didn’t have to escalate.

She simply had to stop, get counsel, and negotiate from a position of clarity. She did not get everything she asked for, but we were able to negotiate a separation package she was comfortable with.

Employees often believe they have no leverage in an “at-will” state. But employers ask for broad releases because they know those rights have value.

A separation agreement is not a take-it-or-leave-it document. It’s a negotiation.

And the earlier an attorney reviews it, the more options you have. Most importantly, you regain control of a situation designed to make you feel powerless.

The Takeaway

When an employer hands you a separation agreement, realize they are asking you to make one of the most consequential decisions of your career.

The decision is often made under pressure, without context, and without fairness.

It doesn’t have to be that way.

You don’t need to respond immediately. You don’t need to sign quickly. And you don’t need to navigate it alone.

That’s where we come in. We are here to help. Because early legal guidance can transform a rushed exit into a stable transition.

That’s what happened for our client here and that’s what we do for everyone who hires us.

We hope you give us the chance.

Additional Case Stories

  • Defending a Foster Parent against False Allegations of Sexual Assault

    When the state charged our client with sexual assault, he vehemently denied the allegations. After months of investigation, we found enough evidence that the state had no choice but to drop the case.

  • Large electronic display in Times Square showing an American flag with police officers walking by in the foreground.

    Winning a Federal Felon in Possession Case

    Our client’s house caught fire, and when firefighters arrived, they acted like cops instead of firefighters. We challenged the legality of their conduct and won.

  • Black and white photo of the Statue of Liberty taken from a low angle, showing her torch and the sky with clouds.

    Winning The First Federal Illegal Reentry Case Of Its Kind

    We were one of the first law firms in the country to take a Supreme Court immigration ruling and apply it to a criminal conviction – and win.

Free Consultations

Email: assistant@ringstromdekrey.com

Fargo
3003 32nd Ave S. #240
Fargo, ND 58103

Detroit Lakes
818 Minnesota Ave. Suite #2
Detroit Lakes, MN 56501
218-847-3994

Moorhead
814 Center Ave. Ste. 5
Moorhead, MN 56560
218-284-0484